Listy klinické logopedie 2020, 4(2):16-29 | DOI: 10.36833/lkl.2020.0326003

Speech and language assessment in adult cochlear implant candidates and users

Mgr. Lucie Nohová1, Mgr. Julie Čefelínová2
1 Ústav speciálněpedagogických studií, Pedagogická fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci
2 Komplexní implantační centrum pro sluchově postižené Brno - sekce pro dospělé, Klinika otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně

In the Czech literature there is a lack of information about speech and language assessment in adult cochlear implant (CI) candidates and users. The article presents the issue of adult cochlear implantation from a speech and language therapist perspective. The paper points out the current changes in the CI candidacy, which have opened the possibility to provide cochlear implantation to other types of patients, including bilateral implantation in adults. The aim of the article is to present an overview of diagnostic tools used abroad. Moreover, it provides the information about the current pre- and post-implantation possibilities in terms of speech and language evaluation in Czechia.

Keywords: cochlear implantation, adult CI candidate, adult CI user, speech and language evaluation, diagnostic tools

Received: October 14, 2020; Revised: November 7, 2020; Accepted: November 8, 2020; Published: December 14, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nohová L, Čefelínová J. Speech and language assessment in adult cochlear implant candidates and users. Listy klinické logopedie. 2020;4(2):16-29. doi: 10.36833/lkl.2020.032.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ADUNKA et al., 2018. Minimum reporting standards for adult cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [online]. 159(2), s. 215-219 [cit. 3. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1177/0194599818764329. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Advanced Bionics LLC, Cochlear Americas, MED-EL Corporation, 2011. Minimum speech test battery for adult cochlear implant users. [online]. [cit. 28. 8. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf
    3. American Academy of Audiology, 2019. Clinical Practice Guideline: Cochlear Implants. [online]. [cit. 20. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.audiology.org/sites/default/files/publications/resources/CochlearImplantPracticeGuidelines.pdf
    4. ANDERSON, C. A. et al., 2017. Adaptive benefit of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults. PNAS [online]. 114(38), s. 10256-10261 [cit. 26. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704785114. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. ASHA [American Speech-Hearing-Association], 2020. Cochlear Implants. [online]. [cit. 22. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589944537§ion=Key_Issues
    6. AUDITORY POTENTIAL, 2011. Minimum speech test battery (MSTB) for adult cochlear implant users, 2011. [online]. Goodyear: Auditory Potential, LLC. [cit. 3. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf
    7. BENCH, J., KOWAL, A., BAMFORD, J., 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) Sentence Lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology [online]. 13, s. 108-112 [cit. 6. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.3109/03005367909078884. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. BERRETTINI, S. et al., 2011. Systematic Review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica [online]. 31(5), s. 299-310 [cit. 2. 9. 2020]. DOI: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262411/ Go to PubMed...
    9. BISHOP, D., 2003. Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG-2). London: Psychological Corporation. ISBN 978-80-7491-2130-3.
    10. BOISVERT, I. et al., 2020. Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: A scoping Review. PLoS ONE [online]. 15(5), e0232421 [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232421. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. BOISVERT, I., McMAHON, C. M., DOWELL R. C., 2016. Speech recognition outcomes following bilateral cochlear implantation in adults aged over 50 years old. International Journal of Audiology [online]. 55, s. 39-44 [cit. 3. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2016.1152403. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. BOLCEKOVÁ, E., PREISS, M., KREJČOVÁ, L., 2015. Token test pro děti a dospělé. Otrokovice: Propsyco.
    13. BOOTHROYD, A., 1968. Developments in Speech Audiometry. British Journal of Audiology. [online]. [cit. 6. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.3109/00381796809075436. Go to original source...
    14. BOOTHROYD, A., HANIN, L., HNATH, T., 1985. A sentence test of speech perception: reliability, set equivalence, and short term learning. Internal report #RCI10 [online]. [cit. 6. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1443&context=gc_pubs
    15. BOUČEK, J. et al., 2017. 30 let kochleárních implantací v České republice. Časopis lékařů českých [online]. 156(4), s. 178-182 [cit. 2. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/casopis-lekaru-ceskych/2017-4/30-let-kochlearnich-implantaci-v-ceske-republice-61470 Go to PubMed...
    16. British Cochlear Implant Group, 2017. Worldwide Candidacy Version 1.0 [online]. [cit. 2. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.bcig.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Worldwide-Candidacy-Summary-Web-Version-1.0.pdf
    17. British Society of Audiology, 2019. Practice Guidance Assessment of speech understanding in noise in adults with hearing difficulties. [online]. [cit. 2. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/OD104-80-BSA-Practice-Guidance-Speech-in-Noise-FINAL.Feb-2019.pdf
    18. BUCHMAN, A. C. et al., 2020. Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements. [online]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. [cit. 20. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. CKI [Centrum kochleárních implantací], 2020. První kochleární implantace. Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové [online]. Hradec Králové: Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové. [cit. 12. 10. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.fnhk.cz/aktuality/prvni-kochlearni-implantace
    20. CKIO [Centrum kochleárních implantací Ostrava - CKIO], 2009. Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava [online]. Ostrava: Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava. [cit. 12. 10. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.fno.cz/klinika-otorinolaryngologie-a-chirurgie-hlavy-a-krku/centrum-kochlearnich-implantaci-ostrava-ckio
    21. CRATHORNE, L. et al., 2012. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bilateral multichannel cochlear implants in adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Clinical Otolaryngology [online]. 37(5), s. 342-354. DOI: 10.1111/coa.12011. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. CSÉFALVAY, Z., KOŠŤÁLOVÁ, M., KLIMEŠOVÁ, M. 2003. Diagnostika a terapie afázie, alexie, agrafie. Praha: Asociace klinických logopedů ČR. ISBN 80-903312-0-3.
    23. ČSORLCHHK ČLS JEP [Česká společnost otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku a Česká lékařská společnost Jana Evangelisty Purkyně], 2012. Kritéria výběru kandidátů pro kochleární implantace [online]. Praha: ČSORLCHHK ČLS JEP. [cit. 4. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.otorinolaryngologie.cz/archiv/dokumenty/2012-02-02_zapis_prilohy.pdf
    24. ČSORLCHHK ČLS JEP [Česká společnost otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku a Česká lékařská společnost Jana Evangelisty Purkyně], 2020. Indikační kritéria pro implantovatelné sluchové pomůcky [online]. Praha: ČSORLCHHK ČLS JEP. [cit. 4. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.otorinolaryngologie.cz/archiv/dokumenty/indikacni_kriteria-CI.pdf
    25. ČSORLCHHK ČLS JEP [Česká společnost otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku a Česká lékařská společnost Jana Evangelisty Purkyně], 2014. Indikační kritéria pro implantovatelné sluchové pomůcky [online]. Praha: ČSORLCHHK ČLS JEP. [cit. 4. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.audionika.cz/medel/public/files/documents/Indikacni-kriteria-ORL-10-2014-2.pdf
    26. DE RAEVE, L., et al., 2020. Prevalence of cochlear implants in Europe: trend between 2010 and 2016. Cochlear Implants International [online]. 21(5), s. 275-280. [cit. 20. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1771829. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Department of Health, Western Australia, 2011. Clinical Guidelines for Adult Cochlear Implantation [online]. Perth: Health Networks Branch, Department of Health, Western Australia. [cit. 20. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/-/media/Files/Corporate/general-documents/Health-Networks/Neurosciences-and-the-Senses/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Adult-Cochlear-Implantation.pdf
    28. DLOUHÁ, O., VOKŘÁL, J., 2011. Test větné srozumitelnosti v hovorovém šumu u osob s normálním sluchem. Otorinolaryng. a Foniat [online]. 60(3), s. 125-130. [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/otorinolaryngologie-foniatrie/2011-3/test-vetne-srozumitelnosti-v-hovorovem-sumu-u-osob-s-normalnim-sluchem-36156
    29. DORAN, M., JENKINSON, L., 2016. Mono-syllabic word test score as a pre-operative assessment criterion for cochlear implant candidature in adults with acquired hearing loss. Cochlear Implants International [online]. 17, Suppl. 1, 13-6 [cit. 5. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1151636. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. DRŠATA, J., HLOUŠKOVÁ, M., 2015. Řečová audiometrie. In: DRŠATA, J. et al. Foniatrie - sluch. Havlíčkův Brod: Tobiáš, s. 87-93. ISBN 978-80-7311-159-5.
    31. DUNN, D. M., 2019. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (5th ed.) [Measurement instrument]. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
    32. EBRAHIMI-MADISEH, A. et al., 2016. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Cochlear Implants International [online]. 17(2), s. 75-80 [4. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2015.1114220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Etymotic Research, 2005. Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise Test (Version 1.03). Elk Grove Village. [online]. [6. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.etymotic.com/downloads/dl/file/id/260/product/160/bkb_sintm_user_manual.pdf
    34. GÁL et al., 2019. Brněnské implantační centrum: výsledky léčby jednostranné kochleární implantace u dospělých pacientů. Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie [online]. 68(1), s. 18-23 [cit. 30. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/otorinolaryngologie-foniatrie/2019-1-28/brnenske-implantacni-centrum-vysledky-lecby-jednostranne-kochlearni-implantace-u-dospelych-pacientu-112886
    35. GÁL et al., 2018. Efektivita jednostranné kochleární implantace u dospělých pacientů s těžkou poruchou sluchu. Cesk Slov Neurol N [online]. 81/114(6), s. 664-668 [cit. 30. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.14735/amcsnn2018664. Go to original source...
    36. GALVIN, K. L., HUGHES, K. C., MOK, M., 2010. Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant? International Journal of Audiology [online]. 49(5), s. 368-377 [4. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.3109/14992020903470767. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    37. GATEHOUSE, S., NOBLE, W., 2004. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology [online]. 43(2), s. 85-99 [cit. 29. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050014.GAYLOR, J. M. et al., 2013. Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery [online]. 139(3), s. 265-272 [cit. 4. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1744. Go to original source...
    38. GIFFORD, R. H., SHALLOP, J. K., PETERSON, A. M., 2008. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant program. Audiology & neuro-otology [online]. 13(3), s. 193-205 [7. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1159/000113510. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    39. HAGERMAN, B., 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scandinavian Audiology [online]. 11, s. 79-87 [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.3109/01050398209076203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. HAHN, A. et al., 2018. Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie v současné praxi. Praha: Grada. ISBN 978-80-271-2608-8.
    41. HENRIQUE, F. P., GUILHERME M. de C., ALEXANDRE C. G., 2016. Cochlear Implantation in Elderly Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [online]. 64(3), s. 691-692 [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13987. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    42. HERMANN, R. et al., 2019. French Society of ENT (SFORL) guidelines. Indications for cochlear implantation in adults. [online]. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases [online]. 136(3), s. 193-197 [cit. 6. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879729619300663?via%3Dihub#bib0325 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    43. HEWITT, D. R., 2007. Evaluation Of An English Speech-In-Noise Audiometry Test. MSc thesis, University of Southampton.
    44. HEYDEBRAND, G. et al., 2007. Cognitive predictors of improvements in adults' spoken word recognition six months after cochlear implant activation. Audiol Neurootol [online]. 12(4), s. 254-264 [cit. 1. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.1159/000101473. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    45. HOCHMUTH, S. et al., 2012. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise. International Journal of Audiology [online]. 51, s. 536-544 [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2012.670731. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    46. HOLMANOVÁ, J., 2007. Vady a poruchy sluchu z hlediska klinické logopedie. In: ŠKODOVÁ, E., JEDLIČKA, I. et al. Klinická logopedie. Praha: Portál, s. 493-530. ISBN 978-80-7376-340-6.
    47. HörTech, 2020. Einsilber Reimtest nach Wallenberg und Kollmeier (WaKo). [online]. [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.hoertech.de/de/produkte/wako.html
    48. HörTech, 2011a. GÖTTINGER SATZTEST (GÖSA). [online]. [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.hoertech.de/images/hoertech/pdf/mp/produkte/goesa/HT.GOESA_Handbuch_Rev01.0_mitUmschlag.pdf
    49. HörTech, 2019. International Matrix Tests. Reliable speech audiometry in noise. [online]. [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.hoertech.de/images/hoertech/pdf/mp/produkte/intma/Broschre_Internationale_Tests_2019_WEB_klein.pdf
    50. HörTech, 2011b. OLDENBURGER SATZTEST (OLSA). [online]. [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.hoertech.de/images/hoertech/pdf/mp/produkte/olsa/HT.OLSA_Handbuch_Rev01.0_mitUmschlag.pdf
    51. KAANDORP, M. W. et al., 2017. Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Trends in Hearing [online]. 21, 2331216517743887. DOI: 10.1177/2331216517743887. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    52. KILLION, M. et al., 2004. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America [online]., 116(4), s. 2395-2405 [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.etymotic.com/media/publications/erl-0052-2004.pdf Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    53. KIOLBASA, A. M., 2015. Evaluation of the American English Matrix Test with cochlear implant recipients. Independent Studies and Capstones [online]. Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine. [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1709&context=pacs_capstones
    54. KNUTSON, J. F. et al., 1991. Psychological predictors of audiological outcomes of multichannel cochlear implants: preliminary findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [online]. 100 (10), s. 817-822 [cit. 13. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.1177/000348949110001006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    55. KULIŠŤÁK, P., BENEŠOVÁ, E., 1996. Afaziologické vyšetření "Western aphasia battery". Česká experimentální verze. Klinická logopedie v praxi. 3(1), s. 4-9.
    56. LANGEREIS, M., VERMEULEN, A., MYLANUS, E., 2018. The role of phonology in novel word learning in adults with CI. Journal of Hearing Science [online]. 8(2), s. 366-367 [cit. 1. 10. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.journalofhearingscience.com/15th-International-Conference-on-Cochlear-Implants,120839,0,2.html
    57. LASEK, R. D. et al., 2019. Age Dependent Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation in Adults. Is There an Age Related Cut-off? Otology & Neurotology [online]. 40(7), s. 892-899 [cit. 3.9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002275. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    58. LIN, V. Y. W. et al., 2017. The development of a cognitive screening test for the severely hearing impaired: the Hearing Impaired Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HI-MoCA). The Laryngoscope [online]. 127(S1) [cit. 26. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26590. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    59. LUTS, H. et al., 2014. Development and normative data for the Flemish/Dutch Matrix test. [online]. [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://limo.libis.be/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=LIRIAS1777721&context=L&vid=Lirias〈=en_US&search_scope=Lirias&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,development%20and%20normative%20data%20for%20the%20Flemish%2FDutch%20Matrix%20test
    60. LUTS, H. et al., 2008. FIST: A French sentence test for speech intelligibility in noise. International Journal of Audiology [online]. 47, s. 373-374 [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1080/14992020801887786. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    61. LUXFORD, W. M., 2001. Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery [online]. 124(2), s. 125-126 [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1024.8732&rep=rep1&type=pdf Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    62. MALECHOVÁ, V., 2016. Diagnostika lexikálně-sémantické jazykové roviny u dětí předškolního věku a u dětí s vývojovou dysfázií. Rigorózní práce. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta.
    63. MALECHOVÁ, V., 2015. Diagnostika lexikálně-sémantické jazykové roviny v předškolním věku. Diplomová práce. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta.
    64. MARKOVÁ, J. et al., 2015. Analýza porozumenia viet v slovenčine: test porozumenia viet s normami. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského. ISBN 978-80-223-3797-7.
    65. MED-EL, 2015. Who gets a Cochlear Implant? [online]. [cit. 6. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.medel.com/docs/default-source/awareness-and-corporate-communication/special-reports/special-report-3---indications/special-report-3---indications---e.pdf?sfvrsn=6ffcd447_4
    66. MOBERLY, A. C. et al., 2018. "Product" Versus "Process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol. [online]. 39(3), e195-e202 [cit. 1. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001694. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    67. MOBERLY, A. C., CASTELLANOS, I., MATTINGLY, J. K., 2018. Neurocognitive Factors Contributing to Cochlear Implant Candidacy. Otology & Neurotology [online]. 39(10), e1010-e1018 [cit. 1. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002052. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    68. MOBERLY, A. C., HOUSTON, D. M., CASTELLANOS, I., 2016. Non-auditory Neurocognitive Skills Contribute to Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology [online]. 1(6), s. 154-162 [cit. 1. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    69. MOBERLY, C. A. et al., 2016. The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults with Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol. [online]. 37(10), s. 1522-1528 [cit. 22. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001211. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    70. NICE, 2019. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. Technology appraisal guidance [TA566]. [online]. [cit. 5. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta566/resources/cochlear-implants-for-children-and-adults-with-severe- to-profound-deafness-pdf-82607085698245
    71. NILSSON, M., SOLI, S. D., SULLIVAN, J. A., 1994. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America [online]. 95(2), s. 1085-1099 [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. DOI:10.1121/1.408469. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    72. NOHOVÁ, et al. [v přípravě]. Test porozumění větám. Olomouc: Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci.OBEREIGNERŮ, R., 2017. Exekutivní funkce. In: KULIŠŤÁK, P. et al. Klinická neuropsychologie v praxi. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, s. 174-204. ISBN 978-80-246-3068-7.
    73. OZIMEK, E., WARZYBOK, A., KUTZNER, D., 2010. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise. International Journal of Audiology [online]. 49, s. 444-454 [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.3109/14992021003681030. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    74. PARADA, J., C., HILLYER, J., PARBERY-CLARK, A., 2020. Performance on the standard and hearing-impaired Montreal Cognitive Assessment in cochlear implant users. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry [online]. 35(4), s. 338-347 [cit. 26. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1002/gps.5267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    75. PISONI, D. B. et al., 2016. Learning and memory processes folowwing cochlear implantation: the missing piece of the puzzle. Front Psychol. [online]. 7, s. 493 [cit. 13. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00493. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    76. PISONI, D. B. et al., 2017. Three challenges for future research on cochlear implants. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [online]. 3(4), s. 240-254 [cit. 1. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.12.010. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    77. PISONI, D. B. et al., 2018. Verbal Learning and Memory After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults: Some New Findings with the CVLT-II. Ear Hear. [online]. 39(4), s. 720-745 [cit. 13. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000530. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    78. RAINE, Ch. H., VICKERS, D., 2017. Worldwide picture of candidacy for cochlear implantation. Ent & audiology news [online]. [cit. 3. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.entandaudiologynews.com/media/6081/entso17-raine-v4-new.pdf
    79. REEDER, R. M. et al., 2014. A Longitudinal Study in Adults With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for Individual Ear and Bilateral Performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research [online]. 57, s. 1108-1126 [cit. 4. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0087. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    80. ROUBÍČKOVÁ, J. et al., 2011. Test 3F: dysartrický profil. Praha: Galén. ISBN 978-80-7262-714-1.
    81. SEDLÁČKOVÁ, K., 2018. Specifika komunikace dospělých osob po kochleární implantaci. Diplomová práce. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Pedagogická fakulta.
    82. SEEMAN, M. et al., 1960. Česká slovní audiometrie. SZN: Praha.
    83. SKŘIVAN, J. et al., 2018. Historie a současnost kochleárních implantací v Česku. Čes-slov Pediat [online]. 73(7), s. 424-426 [cit. 13. 10. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/cesko-slovenska-pediatrie/2018-7-2/historie-a-soucasnost-kochlearnich-implantaci-v-cesku-107182
    84. SKŘIVAN, J., BOUČEK, J., TICHÝ, T., 2019. Kochleární implantace. Časopis lékařů českých [online]., 158, s. 228-230 [cit. 3. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/casopis-lekaru-ceskych/2019-6-7/kochlearni-implantace-118937 Go to PubMed...
    85. SPAHR, A. J. et al., 2012. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear & Hearing [online]. 33(1), s. 112-117 [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    86. SUKOWSKI, H. et al., 2009. Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test). [online]. HNO [online]. 57(3), s. 239-250 [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-008-1727-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    87. SUKOWSKI, H. et al., 2010. Comparison of the Göttingen sentence test and the monosyllabic rhyme test by von Wallenberg and Kollmeier with the Freiburg speech test: Investigation in a clinically representative group of listeners. [online]. HNO [online]. 58(6), s. 597-604. [cit. 7. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-009-2066-1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    88. THERIOU, Ch., FIELDEN, C., KITTERICK, P. T., 2019. The Cost-Effectiveness of Bimodal Stimulation Compared to Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Use in Adults with Bilateral Severe to Profound Deafness. [online]. Ear and Hearing [online]. 40(6), s. 1425-1436. [7. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000727. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    89. TYLER, R. S. et al., 2007. Speech Perception and Localization With Adults With Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implants. Ear & Hearing [online], 28(2), 86S-90S [cit. 8. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803153e2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    90. VAILLANCOURT, V. et al., 2005. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. International Journal of Audiology [online]. 44(6), s. 358-369 [cit. 11. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1080/14992020500060875. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    91. VERMIGLIO, A. J., 2008. The American English Hearing in Noise Test. International Journal of Audiology [online]. 47, s. 386-387 [cit. 11. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1080/14992020801908251. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    92. VICKERS, D. A. et al., 2016. Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using AB words to assess candidacy in adults. Cochlear Implants International [online]. 17(Suppl 1), s. 17-21. [cit. 1. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1161143. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    93. VOKŘÁL, J. et al., 2012. Nastavování zvukových procesorů u pacientů s kochleárním implantátem na Foniatrické klinice 1. LF UK a VFN. Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie [online]. 61(4), s. 216-222 [cit. 30. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/otorinolaryngologie-foniatrie/2012-4/nastavovani-zvukovych-procesoru-u-pacientu-s-kochlearnim-implantatem-na-foniatricke-klinice-1-lf-uk-a-vfn-39662
    94. WAGENER, K. C., BRAND, T., KOLLMEIER, B., 1999. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests. Z. Audiol [online]. 38(2), s. 44-56. [cit. 13. 9. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.uzh.ch/orl/dga-ev/ZfA_1999_38-2_044-056_Original.pdf
    95. WARZYBOK, A. et al., 2015. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test. International Journal of Audiology [online]. 54(Suppl 2), s. 35-43. [cit. 13. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    96. WILLIAMS, K. T., 2018. Expressive Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). [Measurement instrument]. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
    97. ZEMANOVÁ, N. et al., 2016. Validační studie české verze Bostonského testu pojmenování. Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie [online]. 79/112(3), s. 307-316 [cit. 26. 9. 2020]. DOI: 10.14735/amcsnn2016307. Go to original source...
    98. ZHAN, K. Y. et al., 2020. Cognitive Functions in Adults Receiving Cochlear Implants: Predictors of Speech Recognition and Changegs After Implantation. Otol Neurotol. [online]. 41(3), e322-e329 [cit. 13. 10. 2020]. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002544. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content